[quote=“EOD”]John, then you may also take into account the user with the most postings.
Here we would not need a vote then, it will be just figures.
I assume CSAEOD had in mind the one with the most qualified postings which do not even have to be the most in the board here.
Combining quantity and quality of postings I personnaly think that John Moss will be my favourite. :)
What of course does not mean that there are not many many others which I really do appreciate.[/quote]
I DIDN’T INTEND FOR NUMBERS TO BE A CONSIDERATION WHEN I SUGGESTED THIS. I HAVE POSTED A LOT AND STILL DO WHEN I GET A CHANCE BUT SINCE THIS IS MY IDEA I PREFER NOT TO BE CONSIDERED AS I DO NOT PURSUE SELF AGRANDISEMENT IN THIS WAY. I ALREADY HAVE ENOUGH EXPOSURE IN THE AMMO WORLD.
WHAT I CONSIDER IS ;WHO HAS BEEN THE MOST HELPFULL IN PROVIDING INFORMATION AND ENLIGHTENMENT TO THE COMMUNITY. THERE ARE QUITE A FEW ON MY LIST AND I WON’T MENTION ANY BECAUSE IT WOULD BE BEST FOR EACH TO HAVE THEIR OWN IDEA. SOME MENTIONED ARE EXCELLENT AND WE ALL HOPE WILL CONTINUE TO BE.
THIS IS A MAN’S GAME AND IF BLOGGERS ARE TOO SENSITIVE TO RECOGNIZE OTHERS WHO PERFORM IN AN EXCEPTIONAL MANNER THEN IT REALLY IS A WASTE OF TIME ALL AROUND.
MY LAST ATTEMPT TO STIMULATE INTEREST BY OFFERING A $500 COLLECTION TO ANY YOUTH WHO PROVIDED THE BEST EXPRESSION OF INTEREST IN COLLECTING BROUGHT IN A TOTAL OF 0 REPLIES. THAT IS ZERO.
MAYBE NONE OF YOU FOLKS HAVE KIDS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN THE HOBBY. I KNOW THAT MINE ARE NOT AND ACCORDING TO BILL WOODIN HIS ARE NOT EITHER.
IN THE CURRENT INSTANCE WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO RECOGNIZE AN OUTSTANDING CONTRIBUTOR ON A YEARLY BASIS AND I AM WILLING TO SUPPORT THAT. IF NOT , FINE AS WELL.
BEFORE PROCEEDING I WOULD LIKE TO SEE MORE INTEREST . IF NOT , FORGET IT.