For the record, I have a .401 with this h/s: ART.W. 401 16 ECP 1
Thank you for that confirmation.
Nice! That would make for the earliest headstamp for the series per the info we see here so far. I gotsta know…Does your .401 have primer crimps, and if so, how many? If it’s too much work to look and count them, you could just post a picture…(hee,hee).
Here’s my .401.
Thank you very much for posting that!
A while back, JonnyC posted a quiz that included a couple items related to this thread. viewtopic.php?f=8&t=9205
The 8x35 Ribyrolle (3rd from left in the quiz picture) is the .351 WSL necked to 8mm. Wonder if they tried the .401 WSL as well? This is what it might look like, the “8x38 Ribeyrolle” next to a .401 WSL:
I would doubt it was tried, as I can’t think of a readily available bullet to use. I guess they could have also necked it to 8mm.
It is necked in the drawing to an 8mm Bullet. The 401 is simply a normal round of .401 Winchester shown for
comparison. Note the name - 8 x 38 Ribeyrolle.
OK, OK…I had an elderly moment!
Very interesting post. WWI really was a collision of outdated tactics and modern weapons. “Over the Front” magazine published the reminiscences of a French captive balloon pilot who was armed with a Winchester SLR (caliber not stated) along with a photograph of him aiming the rifle and his drawing of the interior of a basket with the muzzle and cocking rod of his Winchester in view. He actually emptied his rifle at an attacking airplane and then bailed out after his balloon was hit. The ground crew was able to get the balloon back to earth but it burned on the ground.
I noted an error in the article; the weight of the .401 SL bullet is given as 7.65 grams (118 grains). In the U.S., this cartridge was only loaded with 200- and 250-grain bullets. Using the drawing in the article, I made some very rough calculations based on an average specific gravity of 10.9 gm/cm³ (Greenhill’s Formula, Hatcher’s Notebook) for a jacketed bullet and by reducing the round-nosed profile to a simple cylinder with a diameter of 10.35mm. A 7.65-gram bullet would be approximately 8.3mm (0.326") long, much shorter than the 18.6mm (0.732") long bullet illustrated. The reproduction is a little fuzzy, so I may be off to the right of decimal. A flat-based 16.2-gram (250-grain) bullet would be about 17.7mm (0.697") in length. A rough calculation for the reduction in weight caused by the base cavity gave about 0.5 grams (8 grains), resulting in a 15.7-gram (242-grain) bullet. Oddly, doubling 7.65 gives 15.3 grams or 236 grains, which goes along with “intended to lighten the projectile” in comparison with the 250-grain bullet.
Can anyone shed any light on this one?
By the way, what does “ART” in the headstamp stand for?
ART = direction de l’artillery (management of the artillery, on which depended the manufacturing of ammunitions before the creation of the service of the equipment) in France until 1918.
The Ribeyrolle 8x35 was the idea of M. Ribeyrolle, manager of the Gladiator factory who worked with Chauchat, and Sutter on the CSRG Mle 1915, and later with Sutter only, also the RSG M1917 and RSG M1918 Semi-Auto Rifles…pretty good for a maker of Cars and Bicycles. The 8x35 Ribeyrolle cartridge was for a proposed "Trench broom"
fully auto gun ( "an “Assault Rifle”) taking some ideas from the .345 Cal Burton Semi-Auto (USA) which used a Pointed .351 WSL cartridge ( “.345” was the Bore diameter, military style). Nothing much came of the 8x35 Ribeyrolle, but French Archives ( Chatellerault) should have some detailed paperwork on it.
They probably used the 8mm Balle “D”, as it was readily available, but a less pointed and lighter bullet would have been an ideal choice for such an advanced cartridge.
Are there any examples out there from factories other than ECP?
The “Trench Broom” associated with the 8x35 Ribeyrolle looked very modern though my understanding was that it was quite heavy. They said it was rejected because it wasn’t very accurate at 400m!
Here is my picture of 8mm Ribeyrolle cartridge
A link to our discussion about an extended magazine for a Winchester 1910 which is possibly French
The .401 projectile shown in the drawing provided by pierrejean comes out as about 204 grains/13.25 grams when calculated with a pure copper jacket and a pure lead core. I would guess the nominal weight would be 200 grains.
Thanks for posting that Ribeyrolle material. Sure looks like they were close to developing a worthwhile product! As DocAV pointed out, the full weight 8x50R projectile is a little out of place, but maybe it has something to do with the concern over longer range use? Regardless, the 8x35 (and especially the fantasy 8x38 Ribeyrolle I illustrated) if fitted with a 125 grain projectile would be fairly close to the performance of the 7.92x33 and 7.62x39 cartridges that helped usher in the era of the assault rifle about 30 years later.
Tullio Marengoni (for Beretta) and Hugo Schmeisser (for Bergmann) were able to design satisfactory blowback operated machine pistols for pistol cartridges during the Great War, but the only way a larger round would work, practically speaking, was with some form of locked breech mechanism, which the pictured Trench Broom appears not to have. The larger Winchester blowbacks were a sort of halfway house, but were really niche firearms for certain sporting and police purposes. Jack
For those interested in acquiring an 8x35 Ribeyrolle cartridge my understanding is they are very easy to fake, and most are fakes, so beware & be careful.
How would you tell??? I’m sure MINE is real, all the others must be fake;)
Seriously Pete, is there a “tell” on the fakes or real ones? PM me if you don’t want to post the answer.
from what I’ve read, Riberoyles weapon had some sort of delayed blowback action, although Huon in his book on French self-loading rifles does not provide any further details
The Balle D projectile of the 8x35mm was not that much heavier that that of the parent .351 WSL. So a blowback action would not be too far fetched.
If the pictured arm had some form of delayed blowback mechanism my uneasiness would be allayed a good bit. But as a straight blowback it ain’t gonna work for long unless it has a bolt as heavy as the .351 Winchester had, remembering that most of the Winchester’s pudgy fore-end comprised a counterweight attached to the bolt proper. Even in blowbacks there’s no such thing as a free lunch. Jack