M160 Frangible

#1

Good morning to all,
need some help with a couple of points with this 7.62 Nato frangible, first being is there any reason other than the guy with the white/grey paint slipped out for a smoke break that this round only has a green tip?
The other question came to light while I was trying to find info on my first question in HWS volume III where I noticed that Frankford Arsenal had developed the XM160 then " In 1963 the XM160 was adopted as the M160 and production was transferred to Lake City"…as my example is dated 1965 it posed another question 'is this correct or did FA continue to manufacture them as well as LC?

P8300004
P8300004.JPG2288x1712 762 KB
P8300005
P8300005.JPG2288x1712 550 KB

Atb
Tony

#2

Tony, I have the same round with the same headstamp but mine does have the correct white band. I hadn’t noticed the bit about production transferring to Lake City in 1963…interesting!

#3

Same here. white/green paint

#4

Hi Jim & Tom,
yes my 63 dated example also has the green & white band, which because of the date I presumed was a XM160 not so sure now if FA did continued manufacture M160 after 1963 it could well be a early production M160.

Don’t you just love our hobby!

Tony

#5

for whatever it’s worth I have it with green over white FA in: FA 62, ⊕ FA 63 but with a whitish grey bullet material, and ⊕ FA 65 as shown but with both colors. The Lake City are : ⊕ LC 70, and a arsenal cut-a-way headstamped ⊕ LC 63.

62
lc63 sectioned 7.62.jpg750x155 115 KB

Two others with these colors are headstamped ⊕ LC 91 & ⊕ LC 93 have GM-jacketed bullets and are not frangible’s.

Noting with just a green tip in anything US in other than the duplex rounds.

#6

My green over white frangible are. NATO FA 62,63,64,65. A h/s that is just FA (6:00). FA 63 MATCH. LC 64 and NATO RA 70

And these all marked Frangible with various note the ones on left are all FA cases. 60-67

image
CAD472B0-B301-4796-8AC6-CE054408192E.jpeg2824x1535 1.43 MB

#7

5.56mm M855, green tip denoting Belgian SS109 type bullet